From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Rename‎. to Clive and Vera Ramaciotti Foundation as per relative unanimity. I'll undo the redirects and make the move. Star Mississippi 01:53, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Clive Ramaciotti

Clive Ramaciotti (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous AfD was no consensus. However, some suggested merging/moving to Clive and Vera Ramaciotti Foundation but that now redirects here. I still believes he fails WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 01:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Sydney Morning Herald article scrapes by as significant coverage of the charity.
  • Australian Women's Register article has info on the charity and has lengthy bio on Vera.
  • cite to a library's holdings of clippings on Cliff, but no real evidence the author actually saw them or that they support material in the article
Oblivy ( talk) 02:06, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. It looks like this AFD is at a similar conclusion as the first AFD. Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.