- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:13, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Circle Economy
- Circle Economy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Business article sourced entirely to self-cites and no indication of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Does not qualify under WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:BEFORE does not turn up any such coverage. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:31, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:39, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:40, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete As per nom, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing ++ 13:19, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:CORP. I was unable to find significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:25, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Badly written, promotional article that lacks added value to WP. gidonb ( talk) 17:10, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.