The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 11:59, 30 December 2021 (UTC)reply
BLP of a run of-the-mill businessman with plenty of primary and low quality references. This is not the first article created by this editor which appears to be UPE.
Mccapra (
talk) 09:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Non-notable/puff piece.
Oaktree b (
talk) 16:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete : Theirs no proof of notability about the article subject and by the way doesn't passes
WP:GNG NEITHER
WP:NPOL. The editor who created this article seems to be new, started editing from 26 September 2021 and from the username review this looks like a paid editor.--
105.112.153.89 (
talk) 10:27, 24 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep : The proof of notability is all there in the articles and news mentions of this individual and no this is not a paid contribution as I'm in no way a paid editor and only just find the subject interesting because of his contributions to business process improvement in my home country. If there are improvements to the article you recommend please go ahead to make them. The article subject passes
WP:GNG and is not a politician so certainly doesn't align with
WP:NPOL.
Wikistarnigeria (
talk) 02:03, 29 December 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.