- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 00:20, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Chrysalis institute
- Chrysalis institute ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable local religious/spiritual organization, per WP:GNG and WP:ORGDEPTH, and written as an advertisement against WP:NOTPROMOTION. ColonelHenry ( talk) 03:57, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 04:00, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 04:01, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not sure what I think yet, but I will say that the Chrysalis Institute itself seems fundamentally non-notable. However, if it legitimately is a successor of the Chrysalis Group founded by Nancy Milner, it probably just barely passes the GNG. I found a few quality sources on that, which I added to the article, but nothing substantial on the new incarnation.— alf laylah wa laylah ( talk) 15:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep It does seem to be the same organization as founded by Nancy Milner. In this case, there are (barely) enough RS discussing it to meet the GNG. I've added some to article. Perhaps more to come, but I think the ones I've added suffice. Reasonable people can certainly disagree about this one, I'll say.— alf laylah wa laylah ( talk) 15:57, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I searched on High Beam and Google and could find nothing substantial in reliable secondary sources on this organization. User:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah has come up with about all there is on this group - and I do not think it is enough. Almost everything one can find is self-description or promotional. This appears to be a small non-notable local spiritual (non-denominational, sort of New Age) group. I don't see anything on the Chrysalis Group or Nancy Milner (deceased) except one old article from 2001 in an "alternative" web news blog. I agree with the nomination. Donner60 ( talk) 07:22, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 10:09, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000 (talk) 06:59, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- delete fails WP:ORG. the sources provided are either primary or local coverage in Richmond. Needs wider coverage to be meet WP:ORG. LibStar ( talk) 13:19, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.