- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LaMona has shown the sources here and on the article do not establish notability and so by strength of argument the consensus is for delete. Davewild ( talk) 18:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Christopher Policinski
- Christopher Policinski ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Known only for being CEO of a company, fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 ( talk) 18:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep CEO of very large company active in the public sphere, lots of coverage ( [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]). Antrocent ( ♫♬) 19:14, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:56, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:56, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:56, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kraxler ( talk) 16:57, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kraxler ( talk) 16:57, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment on links listed by Antrocent: #1 is an interview (does not establish notability); #2 & #4 are by him, not about him; #3 is possibly an RS, although it isn't clear if the Forbes award is a significant one; #5 is brief and about the company. In the article #1 is a directory listing, #2 is an interview, #3 is a dead link. So I do not see sufficient RS for notability in a BLP. Delete LaMona ( talk) 15:50, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 11:17, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 11:17, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.