The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:31, 11 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Christopher K. Tucker

Christopher K. Tucker (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet WP:BIO; the links referenced in the article are primarily about In-Q-Tel, the geospatial industry, and the academic institutions the subject is affiliated with rather than being about the subject himself. A variety of Google searches did not uncover significant information about the subject separate from these institutions. The article's claim that the subject was a dark-horse candidate for CIA Director in 2008 appears to be referenced in passing in a single interview with the subject and does not appear to have been widely discussed at the time in news articles about possible candidates for the position. Some of this article's information may merit inclusion in the articles about In-Q-Tel or some of the geospatial or academic institutions referenced. This article has almost no other articles that link to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.59.16.209 ( talk) 03:31, April 3, 2021 (UTC)

• Comment Completing nomination on behalf of IP editor. Above text is copied from article talk page. I have no opinion of my own at this time. -- Finngall ^talk 04:42, 3 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 09:45, 3 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 09:45, 3 April 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete a non-notable businessman lacking significant coverage of him at a level that would show notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 19:47, 5 April 2021 (UTC) reply
• Comment. He might be notable, but much of the article is cut, pasted, and redacted from here: click on his name or his LinkedIn page. He's not especially well-known and has almost exactly half the followers that I have on Twitter. We're two degrees of separation from each other, FWIW. Bearian ( talk) 21:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.