The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Michig (
talk) 09:16, 15 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Accomplished, but searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show notability. And she doesn't meet
WP:ACADEMIC either.
Onel5969TT me 14:22, 22 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment I have added the full name of the journal she is an editor of, as there is another, longer established journal called just L'Homme. The publisher's webpage is added not because I think it helps establish notability (it doesn't), but as a source of that information. So far, my search has revealed that Hämmerle is one of several editors of the journal, and does not have a chair at her university (both criteria that could establish notability if she was the only or chief editor, and held a named chair). I will search more before voting.
RebeccaGreen (
talk) 16:01, 22 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Weak delete She fails several criteria of
WP:ACADEMIC by a narrow margin. Btw, I corrected the article: she is not a journal founder, but at most a co-founder. --
Oisguad (
talk) 08:19, 24 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. I've added the prize she was awarded in 1999, and think this means she meets point 2 of
WP:ACADEMIC.
Tacyarg (
talk) 00:01, 25 November 2018 (UTC)reply
This prize is hardly a highly prestigious academic award. It is worth only 5000 €, it is given only to women, there are six awardees per year, it goes into narrowly defined fields, it goes mostly to Austria. If you are a woman working as a feminist historian in Austria, then it may be hard to avoid this prize. --
Oisguad (
talk) 07:32, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
hmmmm, like the
olympics, originally winners only received a wreath of olive leaves, participants could only be men, and there were numerous events held, note, showing the ridiculousness of above statement, i personally reckon all olympians are awesome.
Coolabahapple (
talk) 03:00, 28 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Which would be the other point she meets in your opinion? --
Oisguad (
talk) 07:32, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment, an article on Ehrmann-Hämmerle (with no problems) with more info about her has been on the german WP since 2014, see
here, she is a recipient of the
1999 Kaethe Leichter Prize, thanks to
Tacyarg for adding this info to the article, (should probably have its own wikipage) that contributes to her notability (
WP:ANYBIO anyone?:)).
Coolabahapple (
talk) 00:07, 25 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment - inclusion on another wiki is not a valid reason for inclusion. The award is, at best, borderline notable.
Onel5969TT me 00:51, 28 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Alpha3031 (
t •
c) 06:38, 30 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:30, 7 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Cautious Keep From looking at the German wiki equivalent entry there's clearly more to be added, and a brief googling session suggests there are additional online sources available, but people are unlikely to bother with that if the entry is threatened with deletion.
Charles01 (
talk) 16:54, 14 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Searching on "Christa Hämmerle", the name that appears as author on books and articles, I find many reviews and citations of her work. I believe that she does meet
WP:NACADEMIC #1, "The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources." I have added some reviews to the article - more could be added, as well as more information about the areas of her research and its impact in the discipline.
RebeccaGreen (
talk) 01:27, 15 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.