The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
MER-C 19:50, 26 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Player does not qualify for
WP:NRU (Major League Rugby is not a notable league under
WP:NRU), only brief mentions and news of him signing for sides so doesn't qualify for
WP:GNG either.
Rugbyfan22 (
talk) 16:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Oppose Seems to me to meet
WP:GNG, as at least one source is “substantial coverage”, viz. an article about Turori and not a brief mention.
Moonraker (
talk) 07:24, 9 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Don't believe any of the sources on the page or that I can find are 'substantial coverage', that are independent of the source/tournament.
Rugbyfan22 (
talk) 10:53, 9 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Moonraker, as has been discussed
here can you show which of the sources in the article provide enough significant coverage for it to pass
WP:GNG or if there are other sources that you believe enough to allow it to pass
WP:GNG can you provide them.
Rugbyfan22 (
talk) 15:39, 10 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:52, 18 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete – Does not meet
WP:GNG; general
WP:ROUTINE transaction coverage with very little depth outlining his previous clubs. He is capped in a lower level national team, but I can find no evidence he has appeared in any notable tournaments, or even with the team in any official matches. The closest source to meeting GNG is
this in The San Diego Union-Tribune, but it is pretty basic and not enough to push this over the "multiple independent sources of significant depth" of GNG; it is mostly just an interview.
Yosemiter (
talk) 16:46, 19 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - I agree with Yosemiter above
Spiderone 11:55, 23 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:GNG, none of the coverage is either independent or significant.
SportingFlyerT·C 18:06, 26 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.