The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 04:56, 26 April 2020 (UTC)reply
In a previous discussion it was argued that his "multiple lead roles" make him notable. The problem is that all we really have is one recurring TV role, that is not enough on its own. His other lead roles were in films that are not notable, and so do not add towards notability. The sourcing is also downright atrocious.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 15:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 21:43, 18 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete I haven't found any coverage in independent reliable media. Despite playing those minor roles he fails
WP:GNG as well as
WP:NACTOR.
Less Unless (
talk) 10:42, 19 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete as I also completely failed to find any useful backing sources online.
67.243.20.177 (
talk) 19:40, 22 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Weak Delete: There are hundreds and hundreds of hits at newspapers.com—but, of the ones I've gone through so far, the vast majority are mere mentions; any more significant coverage is about a sentence's worth here and there, or a caption under a photo. It's a shame, because a weak argument could have been made for
WP:NACTOR, I think—but there doesn't seem to be in-depth coverage on the subject. If someone finds something, please let me know.
Dflaw4 (
talk) 11:17, 24 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.