The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 12:13, 17 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Article fails
WP:GNG without multiple, independent sources covering the subject in detail. Article was created by
Catholitics (
talk·contribs), which appears to be a single-purpose account as the only edits it made were related to Korzen and the organization he founded.
TM 13:31, 9 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Nothing stated in the article is an instant notability freebie that would entitle him to have a Wikipedia article in the absence of sufficient
reliable source coverage to get him over
WP:GNG, yet the article is "referenced" almost entirely to his and his organization's own
self-published primary source content about themselves rather than any evidence of reliable source coverage.
Bearcat (
talk) 22:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: Per Nom. Article is promotional and self-published sources do not provide independent evidence to support notability.
Otr500 (
talk) 07:54, 13 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.