From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Chicago Union Station. Part of the content has already been merged there, and if anyone wants to merge more, it will be available in the redirect's history. Deor ( talk) 14:27, 20 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Chicago Union Station ridership

Chicago Union Station ridership (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is just a list of passenger statistics for a single station, presented in more detail than is relevant for Wikipedia (see WP:NOTSTATS). The relevant details could occupy perhaps a paragraph in the parent article. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 23:20, 12 November 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Illinois. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 23:20, 12 November 2022 (UTC) reply
    This is one of the nation's busiest rail terminal stations. More than a mere "single station". It's the primary rail transit hub of Metra and the Midwestern hub of Amtrak. SecretName101 ( talk) 01:08, 13 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Merged as collapsible content at the article Chicago Union Station. I'll let others decide whether they like it merged or spun-off. SecretName101 ( talk) 01:45, 13 November 2022 (UTC) reply
    Even collapsed, this would be hilariously WP:UNDUE at the Chicago Union Station article. As cited by the nominator, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of statistics. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 17:46, 14 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Comment I would maybe incorporate the first portion into the Union Station article (with the red and green arrows and percentages); the rest seem less interesting. That or it should have more context given before presenting the statistics in each section. That would help keep this from being a page with mostly charts and numbers. Oaktree b ( talk) 01:57, 13 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Chicago Union Station. None of this is worth merging except maybe for the Amtrak ridership numbers at the very top. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 17:47, 14 November 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.