The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Please take this opportunity to expand the article though. The article is very threadbare and could easily find itself here again. Seddontalk 23:05, 2 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Fails
WP:GNG due lack of
WP:SIGCOV in reliable, independent sources. Particularly the article includes three references, each of which is very basic statistical data (e.g., date of founding and matches played there) or a one-sentence mention. Per
WP:NBUILDING, "The inclusion of a man-made geographical feature on maps or in directories is insufficient to establish topic notability".
My
WP:BEFORE search turned up only a brief additional mention
in the Deccan Chronicle (a short paragraph containing no actual detail about the grounds beyond the year they were founded). A "citations needed" template has been on the page since 2016 with none further added. Looking at the grounds objectively,
judging by the photos of it that are available online, they do not even have viewing stands but only a medium-sized pavilion such as many local non-notable cricketing grounds have, so it seems unlikely that there will be much in the way of significant coverage of the grounds per se given the lack of facillities for anyone to visit the grounds as a spectator.
Comment it has been used by Tamil Nadu, even if it's not their main ground:
[1]. And there are some sources related to it being renamed:
[2],
[3], but would need to do a more thorough search for most old and new name before voting.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 08:30, 19 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Joseph - Happy to withdraw the AFD so long as we're sure those two articles on the renaming aren't flap-copy/PR.
FOARP (
talk) 10:39, 19 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 11:03, 25 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. The ground has played host to Women's ODIs, in addition to first-class and List A matches. Passes the cricket projects inclusion guidelines for cricket grounds.
StickyWicket (
talk) 22:01, 29 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Contrary to what the AfD creator says above, it is one of the grounds where Tamil Nadu plays their home matches. It has hosted 8 first class matches
8th November 2000 Ranji Trophy 2000/01 South Zone Tamil Nadu v Karnataka f45348
10th March 2001 Ranji Trophy 2000/01 Pre-Quarter-Final Tamil Nadu v Delhi f45717
10th December 2001 Ranji Trophy 2001/02 South Zone Tamil Nadu v Hyderabad f46207
25th December 2001 Ranji Trophy 2001/02 South Zone Tamil Nadu v Kerala f46232
24th November 2010 Ranji Trophy 2010/11 Elite Group A Tamil Nadu v Railways f52757
22nd December 2012 Ranji Trophy 2012/13 Group B Tamil Nadu v Uttar Pradesh f54445
21st November 2016 Ranji Trophy 2016/17 Group B Assam v Maharashtra f57498
This is in addition to eight Women's ODI matches.
Tintin 16:25, 30 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep, as it has been used by Tamil Nadu, and it has hosted major matches.
Jackattack1597 (
talk) 19:43, 1 September 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.