- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Charity Clarity
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Charity Clarity ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Source review: 1 is forbes contributor, 3 and 6 are non-indpendent, 7 is probably unreliable, 5 does not have significant coverage. 4 and 2 written by Pratik Dattani, listed as a Huffington Post Contributor. A Google search doesn't provide any major sources. Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs) 13:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and United Kingdom. Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs) 13:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per source analysis and the fact that the article seems very PROMOy. DrowssapSMM ( talk) ( contributions) 13:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.