The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No evidence of notability per
WP:NFILM, completely unreferenced. Has been about this bad since its creation in 2009. GWeb shows directory sites, GNews shows literally one hit on "charades" "eckelberry" and one relevant hit on "first degree" "eckelberry".
David Gerard (
talk) 15:05, 26 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. This film was not a success but it had a notable cast and did receive some attention and coverage. Note that it was released under several different names, which complicates the searching. I've added 4 reviews. --
Arxiloxos (
talk) 16:28, 26 August 2016 (UTC)reply
nice one! I was wondering at the lack of sourcing on a film with so many actually notable names ... -
David Gerard (
talk) 19:36, 26 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Looks like it meets the standards set in
WP:NFILM, but maybe just barely. Nice work by
Arxiloxos. I did not find all of reviews myself, amazed at your websearching prowess.
IllinoisPolska (
talk) 19:39, 26 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep for the above reasons. Notable cast, and it meets the necessary standards. I started the article a long time ago, but somehow it got lost in the shuffle of improvements. Thanks to
Arxiloxos!
Thief12 (
talk) 13:41, 28 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.