The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Reasons for deletion An article about this person was deleted back in 2013 after a discussion, but it has since been re-created without discussion. An admin declined a call for speedy deletion on the grounds that the article has been significantly improved since the earlier version. The main grounds for deletion remains, viz. that the
Kingdom of Hanover ceased to exist when it was annexed by Prussia back in 1866. A pretender to the throne might be notable, but simply being married to one is a very weak claim to notability, see
WP:NOTINHERITED. Some of the references look like trivial gossip.
PatGallacher (
talk) 13:54, 28 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete marriage into a family that has not held any actual power in over a century is not a sign of notability.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 15:45, 29 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Fully agree with nominator's rationale.
Dunarc (
talk) 20:38, 29 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Just removed the deprecated sources and blogs (BLP violations), now all that's left is...tabloids covering her ex-husband.
JoelleJay (
talk) 04:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep A well sourced article. Reading the article I simply fail to see why this person should't be notable.
Oleryhlolsson (
talk) 00:21, 3 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.