- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:21, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
ChangeJar
- ChangeJar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable fintech company; all available sources are merely run of the mill venture funding reports etc. that do not satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. Possibly a case of WP:TOOSOON. jcc ( tea and biscuits) 22:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 04:09, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 04:09, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 04:09, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Note: Article produced by a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment.-- Auric talk 20:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- a nn product / company of 5 ppl, strongly suggesting it's WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopedia entry. Coverage is in passing or routine, failing WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:15, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. There is some exposure but unclear if the company is a keeper even outside WP. gidonb ( talk) 13:38, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.