The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Another SP siding gone after double-tracking. The spot is just south of the Benson airport, which wasn't built until 1999; otherwise the area is a another big blank spot on the nap.
Mangoe (
talk) 20:02, 28 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete Mass-produced false content, zero newspapers.com results for a supposed community, just some mentions of the siding.
Reywas92Talk 23:13, 28 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Another railroad facility mistaken for a community. No indication it was a community or notable in any other way.
Glendoremus (
talk) 03:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete More hits on
Atriplex canescens, AKA Chamiso. Every mention in newspapers.com that is not about the bush is about rail incidents near this siding. No indication it was ever a populate place.
MB 05:05, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Neither notability nor populated place for this locale is established. The 1915 and 1926 Benson, Arizona 1:250,000 quadrangle shows only "Chamisco" and nothing else. The 1943 Benson, Arizona 1:250,000 quadrangle shows only a siding symbol at Chamisco. Later, the 1963 Nogalaz, Arizona 1:100,000 shows double tracks at "Chamisco Siding". At most, the 1:24,000 quadrangle maps show only "Chamisco" and "BM 3848" by a railroad track. None of these maps show any populated place or structues associated with "Chamisco". Likely as discussed above, it is ony an insignificant, defunct railroad siding.
Paul H. (
talk) 17:48, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.