From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 06:12, 27 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Center for Research and Promotion of Farmers

Center for Research and Promotion of Farmers (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG The Banner  talk 17:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk 17:55, 16 July 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bolivia-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk 17:56, 16 July 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. Probably notable. A search for references under the Spanish name or acronym should help. See Find sources, above. The Spanish Wikipedia doesn't have an article on the group, but some references show up: [1] Eastmain ( talkcontribs) 19:13, 16 July 2018 (UTC) reply
    • No, also under the Spanish name there is not much about this organisation. The Banner  talk 21:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC) reply
      • There is an English-language book [2] listed among the references published in The Netherlands. As well, I added some Spanish-language references. I think that notability is firmly established. Eastmain ( talkcontribs) 04:20, 17 July 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. — BillHPike ( talk, contribs) 07:22, 17 July 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Reopened discussion per request on user talk page. (non-admin relist)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EggRoll97 ( talk | contribs) 09:53, 2 August 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.