The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete most of the sources are either a passing mention, or include a quote by Heald with a one-sentence passing mention. The ones with more meat are not independent. I couldn't find further high-quality sourcing.
Femke (
talk) 18:14, 1 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete - can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show they pass
WP:GNG.
Onel5969TT me 21:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Weak Delete -
This looks good and in-depth, but not enough if we can't find a few more like this.
Caphadouk (
talk) 01:44, 3 February 2022 (UTC)reply
That is a PR website with a PR article. scope_creepTalk 09:15, 3 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.