- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ajpolino ( talk) 23:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Carlos St. James
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Carlos St. James ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not meet requirements of notability IvanMilsbein ( talk) 15:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC) Page appears to be self-promotion and resume content. Refer to criteria for determining whether person is notable here: [ [1]] IvanMilsbein ( talk) 16:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 17:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 17:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:47, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Likely a promotional article. None of the reliable sourcing appears to be significant coverage that is actually about the subject. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 16:03, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Oaktree b ( talk) 20:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom fails WP:GNG. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 21:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.