The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 06:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)reply
KEEP - a relevant local mayor of significance. Many other local mayors are listed.
Jg10101 (
talk) 22:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Please clarify what you mean by “relevant”. Could you point to actual sources? Almost zero independent, significant coverage was found. “Many other local mayors are listed”–Ok?
AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (
talk) 23:01, 28 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 09:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete Almost all the coverage is
WP:ROTM coverage as a councillor/mayor or about his misdemeanor charge for trying to influence a government decision[1] which isn't really an unusal thing for a politician for
WP:CRIME #2. Not meeting
WP:GNG or
WP:NPOLShaws username .
talk . 15:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.