The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 16:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC) reply

CarProperty.com

CarProperty.com (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable niche real estate website. I would have prodded it but (1) it was kept at a 2015 AfD; and (2) it has some mentions in the New York Times [1] and Chicago Tribune [2]. I think it's a pretty clear WP:CORPDEPTH fail, and I think this deserves fresh consideration. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 04:13, 15 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 04:13, 15 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 04:13, 15 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 04:13, 15 August 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep: The sources presented in the previous AfD are reliable and talk about the site: Chicago Tribune, NY Times, Inman, Road & Track, The Car Connection and Huffington. Therefore, the article is good enough to pass WP:GNG. ASTIG😎 _{( ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 21 August 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep - Easily clears new WP:CORPDEPTH requirements. ~ Kvng ( talk) 22:02, 28 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.