- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Canelo Álvarez vs. Gennady Golovkin#Rematch. As User:Toohool says, the content has been merged to Canelo_Álvarez_vs._Gennady_Golovkin#Rematch and it’s necessary to retain the history of this article for attribution purposes. A redirect is thus the way to go with merged-to and merged-from templates (I will add these). Whether the topic warrants a stand-alone article can be discussed on the talk page. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:15, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Canelo Álvarez vs. Gennady Golovkin II
- Canelo Álvarez vs. Gennady Golovkin II ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Cancelled boxing match. No longer notable. Details can be covered in other relevant articles, but pre-event notability for the fight is conditional on the fight actually occurring. ViperSnake151 Talk 23:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:33, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:33, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:33, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Looks like someone's crystal ball was not working; that is the risk editors take when writing about events that have not happened yet. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 03:03, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect to Canelo Álvarez vs. Gennady Golovkin#Rematch. Nom has already merged the article content there, and from what I understand, we have to keep the history of this article for attribution purposes. I would also support a Keep outcome, as the topic easily meets WP:GNG, and having been canceled doesn't override that (hence the existence of Category:Cancelled projects and events). Toohool ( talk) 16:36, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.