- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Procedural Keep. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calvin Lo (businessman) (2nd nomination) just closed at the beginning of August and I doubt that much has changed in the past few weeks. Also, the accusatory nomination statement didn't help. I recommend that the nominator move on, at least for a few months. Maybe even help improve the article, huh? Liz Read! Talk! 01:57, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Calvin Lo
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Calvin Lo ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Calvin Lo has been blocked multiple times on Wikipedia for undisclosed paid abuse, finally an extended user:Cunard creates his page by Calvin Lo (businessman) to bypass this block. Except Forbes staff article, all news articles on internet have a clear COI, published without any research (Now removed from his page). LO doesn't qualifies for a Wikipedia page with just one news reference and really his scam to be a billionaire is not enough. I am sure, a lot of (his) paid editors will jump-in with a KEEP vote, lets UNKEEP them and delete this spam page. All around news is just about Fake announcements for buying F1 and other things. Simple, lets keep Wikipedia clean and ask Cunard why he created page by title Calvin Lo (businessman) instead of Calvin Lo? Fishgrail2 ( talk) 14:46, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
- This looks like an attack AfD directed at
Cunard
A. B. (
talk •
contribs •
global count) 19:15, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- Cunard did not edit this article; he just moved the existing article to a different title.
- —
A. B. (
talk •
contribs •
global count),
A. B. (
talk •
contribs •
global count) 19:19, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- Fishgrail2, you appear to have misread the article history. Cunard did not create the article. Please redact those portions of your nomination statement that imply Cunard did anything Cundard did not do. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 20:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep No, he's notable. Appears to not be what the article claims he is/glosses over it. He's apparently tried to fudge his way onto a billionaire's list, for example [1]. Article given here has a brief mention, but I think he's more notable as an, um, "Forbes list enthusiast" and his attempts get on the list, then for anything else. I won't wade into the discussion of how rich or not rich he is or pretends to be, but there's a story here. Oaktree b ( talk) 20:28, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Hong Kong, and Canada. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:50, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep and procedural close; this article has already been closed as keep in 2 AFDs earlier this year, including /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Calvin_Lo_(businessman)_(2nd_nomination) which closed earlier this month. - Indefensible ( talk) 21:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per Indefensible’s comment and in reaction to the troubled nomination statement above. — A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count) 22:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.