The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:02, 21 April 2018 (UTC)reply
PRODed twice already. I concur with
User:Scope creep's rationale: "Fails the new
WP:NCORP standard. Startup with routine news coverage, e.g. funding."
SmartSE (
talk) 10:56, 5 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete I was planning to Afd it. The new
WP:NCORP notability standard could almost be explicity written for this article. Delete.
scope_creep (
talk) 10:59, 5 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 13:40, 13 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Corporate spam, no indications of notability. They appear to have one a couple of awards but these awards are not prestigious enough to meet the criteria for notability. Topic fails GNG and
WP:NCORP.
HighKing++ 13:14, 18 April 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.