The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 02:02, 3 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Declined speedy. Non-notable company and product; borderline advertising.
9Nak (
talk) 14:17, 28 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep Currently, the article does not meet
notability for companies, as there is no significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Press Releases do not count. However, a google search shows that there is coverage out there.
1,
23--
Omarcheeseboro (
talk) 17:36, 28 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete fails
WP:CORP; when it does pass, then allow an article.
WP:NOT a crystal ball.
Josh Parris 12:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete Seems worth observing that the Mark Brophy mentioned as the author of two of the references appears to be an employee of the subject of the article
[1]. NPOV problems? Not much notability when those articles are taken out of play (as they should be).
Brammarb (
talk) 13:34, 1 December 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.