- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Softly. T. Canens ( talk) 11:14, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
COSMOS 1161898
- COSMOS 1161898 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable per WP:NASTRO. No references, no claims to notability. Simbad shows a grand total of two papers mentioning this object, both as part of a very large list. I could find no specific publications about this galaxy. Lithopsian ( talk) 19:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 20:19, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:40, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:40, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.