From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:G5 NeilN talk to me 01:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC) reply

CK Morgan (singer)

CK Morgan (singer) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:MUSICBIO. The sources are passing mentions or release announcements. The chart, 1wxrld, is not a national chart it is essentially a blog. ("Recently I started a music chart, a very very personal listing of songs I called 1wxrld charts of a Top 200 weekly listing of songs updated every Sunday. Of course this has no bearing on actual success, as it is a very personal, say biased chart of mine"From About 1wxrld).

This article was deleted at AfD last year and should properly be looked at a CSD#G4 however the creator has removed the tag two or three times [1] [2] [3] and I am not going to war over it. Jbh Talk 14:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Links to previous AfDs:
  1. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CK Morgan - 6 deletions as CK_Morgan
  2. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CK Morgan- Singer
  3. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CK Morgan (2nd nomination)
  4. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C.K. Morgan
If this closes as delete please consider WP:SALTing the various permutations of the article name. Requiring WP:AFC so many recreations does not seem unreasonable. Jbh Talk 13:09, 17 July 2016 (UTC) reply
  1. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C.k Morgan (Daflyboy). duffbeerforme ( talk) 00:47, 18 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jbh Talk 14:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Jbh Talk 14:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Note Pinging @ Joe Decker: the closing admin of the last AfD who can check if this article and the older one are substantially different. Jbh Talk 15:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC) reply
    In my view, there are sufficient differences to keep this from being eligible for speedy deletion under G4. (Not expressing a view on redeletion here, just that there are differences in sourcing and text relative to the version in the discussion I closed. -- joe decker talk 06:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Thank you. Jbh Talk 12:26, 17 July 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Comment Exactly like Joe said this version is better then the previous one that was deleted This article should not be deleted it could be maybe be improved better that's why there's a stub over there for it to be more improved This article is way better then the old one so next time Do a lil bit of homework before speedy deletion Debbyloves234 ( talk) 07:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Please know, as I explained to you previously, only admins can view deleted pages. Normal users can only see that previous deletions occurred and 3 delete AfDs is quite excessive. Also please note that Wikipedia's deletion policy recommends "doing homework" AKA WP:BEFORE which I did. The only thing I found were trivial mentions, album announcements and a note he was doing a collaboration but no further information - which is also all you have in the article. I do not think that coverage meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. If better sources, that meet those requirements, come up in the course of this AfD I have no problem withdrawing my nomination or changing my !vote.

Finally, you may want to change the "Comment" above to "Keep" to make it clear to the closer you want the article kept. Jbh Talk 12:26, 17 July 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Comment @ Debbyloves234: Do you have any source to back up the claim now in the article that Shack it down made it to #20 on Billboard? If it is true then he will pass WP:NALBUM but I can not find any source for that claim nor does anything show up when searching the Billboard web site. Jbh Talk 12:43, 17 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Never mind, I see it was the 1wxwrld claim just linked to Billboard Hot 100 in the chart. Jbh Talk 12:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC) reply
I honestly didn't know you were that stupid , where does it say billboard charts ? This article is definitely notable in Ghana and it does meet criteria this topic is closed because to me this article is better then the previous one I can update and add more to this article I'm not even done yet , that's where clearly it says you can help to make this article better so please get your facts right and stop being a pain in the ass , I don't understand why the hate tho u could actually help to improve the article better but your fighting for something which ain't worth it it's not like your making or getting any money out of this Debbyloves234 ( talk) 12:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The link, in the chart you created here ( US) goes links to Billboard Hot 100. If he has actually had a song on that chart and you had a reference for it he would have passed notability criteria and I would have withdrawn my nomination.

  • "it it's not like your making or getting any money out of this". Are you? Please see WP:PAID for Wikipedia's policies on paid editing. Also, being rude and insulting, as above, really gains you nothing and costs you respect and goodwill. Jbh Talk 13:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Not trying to be rude here but at least give people the chance to improve it better I'm still working on it , maybe my mistake putting the US chart should have done it proba but I don't see this getting nominated for deletion At least give people a chance a few days to improve it better that's why I put the stub over there so people can help and I'm still working towards it to add more reference And stuff it's rather better helping then going against each other ain't cute Debbyloves234 ( talk) 13:52, 17 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Honestly, when I see an article which has been deleted 9 times through 4 prior deletion discussions I am disinclined to give it the benefit of the doubt when it shows no signs of passing the notability criteria. Please read the General notability guidelines and Notability criteria for mucians for what is needed - in particular significant coverage (At least a couple of paragraphs and not press releases or album anouncements etc) in multiple independent, reliable sources.

If you would like it can be moved to draft space - DRAFT:CK Morgan - where you will be able to work on it. Once an article is in Main space it needs to meet Wikipedia's content guidelines though.

Also, please indent your replies. It makes it easier to for others to follow the discussion. I have fixed the formatting of this thread. Please take a look at A brief introduction to editing talk pages. Thank you. Jbh Talk 14:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC) Last edited: 00:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC) reply

then you might aswell move it to a user space because i dont see whats the arguement is asll about i need some few days to improve it i mean to improve this article more better 87.145.150.145 ( talk) 18:42, 17 July 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Debbyloves234: This AfD will run for at least 7 days before it is closed so you do have a bit of time, but you want me to move it into DRAFT space for you please sign into your account and confirm the request you(?) made as an IP above and, so long as no one else has !voted, it can be Userfied per request and the AfD closed. Jbh Talk 19:03, 17 July 2016 (UTC) Last edited: 00:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Even if I were inclined to withdraw my nomination, which I no longer am with a history of abusive recreation attempts like noted below, another editor !voting delete makes it impossible. Jbh Talk 00:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Salt, Scorch, Ban. It's been more than 9 times.
CK Morgan 5 times, C.K M.O.R.G.A.N (FlyBoy), C.K M.O.R.G.A.N (DaFlyBoy), CK Morgan- Singer, CK Morgan (Flyboy), C.k Morgan, CK- Morgan, C.K-Morgan, C.K Morgan (singer), C.k Morgan (flyboy), C.k .Morgan, C.K .Morgan, C.K . Morgan, C.k Morgan (Daflyboy), C.K. Morgan, CK MORGAN, Ck Morgan (Rnb Singer), CK Morgan (Singer)
Draft:C.K. Morgan, Draft:CK Morgan, Draft:CK Morgan (Singer), Draft:C.k Morgan twice.
Missing any? duffbeerforme ( talk) 00:38, 18 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Damn! How did you dig up the other deletes which were not associated with the previous AfDs? I have the script which shows the previous AfDs and previous deletes but... damn, someone really wants a Wikipedia article. Jbh Talk 00:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.