The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Computer chess#Availability. czar 15:05, 8 July 2017 (UTC) reply

CCRL

CCRL (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant third party coverage. -- Michael White ^{T· C} 18:17, 24 June 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete Fails GNG. South Nashua ( talk) 18:50, 24 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:38, 24 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:38, 24 June 2017 (UTC) reply

• Merge to computer chess - Doesn't seem quite notable enough for a stand-alone article, but it's already mentioned -- and worth expanding upon a little bit -- at the computer chess article. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 00:01, 26 June 2017 (UTC) reply
• Redirect or merge Per Rhododendrites. It's mentioned there, making this a plausible search term if nothing else. Smartyllama ( talk) 17:25, 29 June 2017 (UTC) reply

• merge per Rhododendrites. Rrachet ( talk) 16:15, 5 July 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.