- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
C. John Wilder
- C. John Wilder ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Standard "About us" biography/CV from bog-standard executive. Nothing but puffery. Calton | Talk 23:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I'm torn about this one. On the one hand there is news coverage, not huge amounts, but it's there: see [1]. On the other hand, this is obviously a puff-piece intending to promote; and remains so despite my throwing out a fair bit of the fluff. I'm leaning delete, but uncertain. Vanamonde ( talk) 09:43, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Spam, and notability is not inherited. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 17:18, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as clear advertising including the PR awards "Best in so-and-so and in so-and-so". SwisterTwister talk 19:38, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Xaxing ( talk) 06:43, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - clear WP:COI and failure to establish independent notability. DrStrauss talk 22:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.