Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Butterfly_Twists References

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(
speak to me)} 03:44, 4 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Butterfly Twists

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created by SPA, article has list of non-reliable sources. Appears to be advertising type page and my own search came up with no significant coverage. mikeman67 ( talk) 15:42, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. JAaron95 ( Talk) 16:03, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:03, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:03, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:03, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Delete - I'm not familiar with some of the sources listed and my searches found nothing significant here, here and here. The only possible move target is Pentland Group but it seems they're only a minority stakeholder so deleting may be best for now. SwisterTwister talk 16:50, 10 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:32, 16 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:00, 22 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Delete - promotional advert, no coverage in independent sources Kraxler ( talk) 21:26, 3 July 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.