The result was keep. Notability seems established, argument can continue about the title. Fences& Windows 23:36, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Advanced search for: "Brusselization" | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Term appears to be made up, having no sources attesting to its existence. Article should be deleted before the existence of this article results in seemingly legitimate use arises from it. Louiedog ( talk) 18:21, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Accordingly, the same principle has to be applied here: we need to determine which spelling, ss or x, is actually attested in urban studies literature as the actual name of this specific concept, and use that spelling regardless of whether or not it corresponds to the usual English language spelling for the city of Brussels itself. Again, I'm not offering a !vote one way or the other, as I'm unfamiliar with the topic — but on policy grounds, it's a question of which spelling is actually attested in the actual literature. Bearcat ( talk) 21:46, 21 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Yes, Connolly15's rationale above is now wrong. No-one, it seems is watching and reading the article, not even the nominator. Almost nothing above is based upon the article at hand, or even the subject at hand, let alone its sources and any potential sources. Raise your hands, anyone in this discussion, who has actually made the effort to look for what sources exist on this subject (as opposed to much of the above which is discussing some ill-defined, slang named, other subject).
My searches turn up things like doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2011.08.007 as the very first result on Scirus. Uncle G ( talk) 08:16, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply