The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy ( talk) 03:57, 21 August 2008 (UTC) reply
The subject of the article has requested [1] deletion citing real world problems arising from repeated errors in the article. The subject appears to be only marginally notable so courtesy deletion after an AFD is within guidelines. Spartaz Humbug! 05:50, 18 August 2008 (UTC) reply
*Delete: The article does not contain one URL or link to independent commentary which demonstrates her notability. If she is notable, there must be some commentary out there. Why is it not in the article? No wonder there are currently errors in the article. At the moment, the article is mostly unreferenced babble taken from fan websites. I will change my stance if some online references to independent commentary are placed in the article. Delete the article now. Bring it back another day if it is rewritten from factual sources. --
Lester 21:00, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
::Comment: So now there is a reference for the charts. But still no reliable online reference for the commentary. If she's "bigger than
L&P", that's even more reason to expect some minimum standards with the article, and more reason to expect reliable sources for the commentary. As the subject complained about the factuality of the article, plus the inclusion of only unreliable references for that commentary, the article should be swiftly deleted, to be returned at a later date if someone puts the work into finding reliable references.--
Lester 03:23, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
reply