The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Consists entirely plot and information from
WP:PRIMARY sources, aside an article in The Telegraph which only mentions the character in passing. Does not appear to meet
WP:GNG or
WP:NCHARACTERPrisencolin (
talk) 04:07, 15 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete The character seems to fail the notability guidelines due to a lack of usable sourcing. The only thing I could find is stuff about the actor who played him. Plus the article relies way to much on an overly detailed narrative tone and would take a fundamental re-write not to. So, I think TNT also applies. --
Adamant1 (
talk) 06:45, 15 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect - An article should (when considering GNG) should not be deleted based on lack of secondary sources in the article at that time, but on whether such sources exist. However I struggle to find any appropriate sources, seemingly like Adamant1. --
TedEdwards 22:07, 19 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.