The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 05:41, 24 February 2021 (UTC)reply
I cannot find any evidence he's notable for his marketing/comms work, nor as an author. There are event listings for author talks/signings, but the only in depth pieces I've found are
interviews/
blurbs so they don't work.
Mollifiednow did some updating and source hunting late last year but was similarly unable to take this article further.
StarM 01:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - how surprising. A public relations guru has an entirely undue article on Wikipedia. Fails
WP:ANYBIO.
174.254.192.137 (
talk) 01:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete He's written some articles for magazines and self-published a book. Not notable.
Oaktree b (
talk) 15:17, 16 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete a non-notable person in the advertising industry.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 17:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep - A Google search turned up reliable sources, which I have added to the article. A search also found that the subject has written three books, two of which were released by traditional publishing houses, he won a state award, and he contributed to a fourth book, a collection of short stories co-written with authors in the US and UK. The subject and his books have been featured in multiple articles, including in the Las Vegas Review-Journal, and he regularly appears on Nevada public radio. I cleaned up the article, removed puffery, and added content with reliable sources to show notability. Clearly passes
WP:GNG and meets
WP:BIO. -
AuthorAuthor (
talk) 09:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete. All the coverage added is either local to him or an interview or both, so it fails
WP:N, which demands sources that are independent (interviews fail here) and which indicate interest from the world at large (local-only sources fail here). ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 21:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.