The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Hi I must admit I can’t entirely make out the case in Doncram’s lengthy explanation about why this article about this film festival should be merged into an article about ….. a different film festival but I’ve no objection to that if someone understands the point better than me and is willing to do it.
Mccapra (
talk)
10:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Hello, in fact BRAFF (State festival) and Inffinito (Private prod company) are not connected, I'm afraid. Will try to improve the article as BRAFF, rapidly to help warrant a Keep but I have little time to do so. Best, -
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)11:10, 14 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep and move to Inffinito with extra content regarding the other versions of the festival which together should pass
WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary im my view,
Atlantic306 (
talk)
20:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete I'm open to changing my mind, but I'm unconvinced at the moment. I've (mostly) read the prior AfDs, and I'm seeing claims about how if the BFFL is merged into an "Inffinito" article that the sources from the various connecting festivals would meet GNG, but I'm not seeing substantiation of that claim and I can't find much myself. I'm seeing a lot of "this festival exists" / "we endorse this festival" / "this festival showed XYZ film" / "come to this festival at XYZ date" sources both at BFFL and Inffinito, but nothing that gives any SIGCOV or commentary on the festival itself. There isn't an existing article to merge into, so I think the best outcome is deletion and if an editor actually decides to create "Inffinito" and they really want the sources currently present here at BFFL, any administrator can be asked to retrieve them. —
Sirdog(
talk)
03:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC)reply
I said I might try, out of consideration for Doncram's work. But I'd rather wait for the move (and keep, for that matter). All right, I'll create the page first then, -
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)16:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC). Donereply
Delete Per nom and Sirdog's eval, fails GNG and NEVENT. No WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BEFORE found routine mill news, promo, nothing that meets SIGCOV. //
Timothy ::
talk17:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.