From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 08:18, 10 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Brandon Jay

Brandon Jay (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG as a non-notable businessman. His only apparent claim to notability is founding a company deleted via AfD a while back and appears to have gone under several years ago. GPL93 ( talk) 23:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GPL93 ( talk) 23:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. GPL93 ( talk) 23:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete: Per nomination. Most of the references are referencing the defunct company. Independent Google search yielded little to no coverage. If the notability is contingent on a company deemed not notable, is the subject notable at all then? — BriefEdits ( talk) 02:29, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete Per nom. Subject is not a notable figure. As mentioned, article seems to be built on the foundation of his company, which is also not notable. Hidden Hills Editor ( talk) 13:16, 3 March 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.