The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No real demonstration of notability. Struggling to find independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources. References provided are either mentions-in-passing or rely almost exclusively on company produced material and/or quotations (fails
WP:CORPDEPTH and/or
WP:ORGIND).
Edwardx (
talk) 14:56, 18 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
SpartazHumbug! 05:24, 26 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - Not notable.
Acnetj (
talk) 08:54, 26 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - "Boudicca Proxy Consultants" is a notable proxy solicitation company. References are reliable and good.
SDRaR111 (
talk) 10:15, 28 March 2018 (UTC) — Note to closing admin:
SDRaR111 (
talk •
contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this
AfD. reply
Keep - My opinion goes with SDRaR111 as "Boudicca Proxy Consultants" is notable for its several mentions in www.thetimes.co.uk. The linkedin link should be removed. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Wedlock143 (
talk •
contribs) 17:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC) —
Wedlock143 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Point of Order -
SDRaR111 and
Wedlock143,
AFD is not a vote so please don't treat it as such. It's also suspicious when users with few edits (or their first edit) seem to be attracted to the same AFD.
Killiondude (
talk) 06:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:31, 2 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete per nomination and per User:K.e.coffman above. I can only find passing mentions of the company in
WP:RS online.
The Mighty Glen (
talk) 18:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.