The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unsourced advertorial.
QVVERTYVS (
hm?) 14:39, 30 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Thank you for highlighting issues with this article. As the person who uploaded it, I'd like to make sure the article conforms to Wikipedia's guidelines. It seems the main issue is that the article does not refer to any sources - am I correct? If this is the case, I will add relevant sources tomorrow.
Note also that a previous version of this article was removed: I edited it extensively and reuploaded. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
OnemanIan (
talk •
contribs) 15:29, 30 June 2015
Keep The fact it was established in 1699 should be enough to make it notable. Any promotional wording can be removed
Gbawden (
talk) 11:22, 1 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep There are sources that need to be added to the article:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.