The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild ( talk) 17:24, 19 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Books That Grow

Books That Grow (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Antigng ( talk) 11:36, 12 June 2015 (UTC) reply

• keep An award and a showcase listing by two fairly substantial bodies. Poor article, but it's an interesting idea (Disclaimer: Some years ago I was a published researcher in this same field) and the coverage paid so far seems to scrape our bar for WP:N. Can you expand upon the "It's just not notable" rationale? Andy Dingley ( talk) 13:31, 12 June 2015 (UTC) reply
• KEEP. Gee whiz, taking 5 minutes to read beyond the poorly written-poorly sourced article to determine whether or not Books That Grow was notable reveals - via coverage in the fields of education, ed-tech, crowdsourcing, literature, and mainstream media - it is. I've edited the article and provided citations that support my KEEP recommendation.
• Keep: The present article is still promotional. It has testimonials in it, for one thing. If the nomination got the article improved, that's a good thing. Articles that advertise and don't substantiate their claims are a bad thing. (And yes, it's not very controversial to say that low literacy adults are an underserved population.) Hithladaeus ( talk) 18:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:37, 12 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:37, 12 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:37, 12 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:38, 12 June 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.