The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
It seems to be more appropriate for a personal blog. It is a guide, rather than an encyclopaedic entry – there is no balance ion the information provided, and no sources. Also, it goes completely against the MoS, and has no proper background provided. Saying things like, 'The creator ... is unknown' makes me think that this is inappropriate for WP.
Sb2001talk page 17:17, 27 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete as a hoax/made up. Not sure this really warrants an AfD. CHRISSYMAD❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:22, 27 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.