The result was delete. Consensus is that this is a minor aspect of the Mossad and should be covered there if at all. Sandstein 18:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
[1] is an AfD of a well sourced article closed and deleted but actually is not anti-sematic if you carefully read the references such as Thomas, Gordon (19 November 2015). Gideon's Spies: Mossad's Secret Warriors. Pan Macmillan. ISBN 978-0330375375, [2] and Kahana, Ephraim (19 April 2006). Historical Dictionary of Israeli Intelligence (Historical Dictionaries of Intelligence and Counterintelligence). Scarecrow Press; Illustrated edition. p. 244. ISBN 978-0810855816. If that article is deleted this should go since it is based on just one source - Ostrovsky, Victor; Hoy, Claire (1991). Ostrovsky, Victor; Hoy, Claire (eds.). By way of deception: a devastating insider's portrait of the Mossad. General Paperbacks. ISBN 978-0-7736-7316-8. that is based on an author's personal view unlike the Sayanim article which had several reliable sources. This article should be deleted or redirected accordingly as there's no need for a article based on one source, unless you can show other reliable sources like those in the deleted Sayanim article. BlueD954 ( talk) 06:49, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
If that article is deleted this should goWP:OTHERSTUFF. No comment on the article (and I was pinged here, apparently everyone who ever made the smallest edit on the aritcle is being pinged? Please be careful of WP:CANVASS...) - The Bushranger One ping only 07:03, 28 January 2021 (UTC)