The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 20:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of Discworld through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so any coverage in the main articles is enough detail on the character TTN ( talk) 23:12, 16 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Keep Important plot influence on multiple books. But yes, the article could use improvement. Lots42 ( talk) 03:40, 17 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment I have to take issue with "There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article" Is there a deadline no one told me about? the article has been growing steadily & no one had tagged it to be sourced till this month, I only came across it when the AfD was mentioned on the discworld project talk page, give the editors a chance to fix it first. -- Nate 14 81 14:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC) reply