The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. – bradv 🍁 17:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Bitcoin Suisse

Bitcoin Suisse (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article appears to be mainly WP:PROMO and does not seem to meet WP:GNG, because it doesn't look like there are multiple references that are independent, significant, reliable and secondary at the same time. Streepjescode ( talk) 14:55, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 15:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 15:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply

• Is this a refbombing of press release churnalism and passing mentions? - David Gerard ( talk) 11:55, 23 March 2020 (UTC) reply
  • @ David Gerard: I got the same impression. Are you voting delete or didn't you made a decision yet? Streepjescode ( talk) 11:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC) reply
    • I wasn't sure, 'cos I don't read German :-) I'll hit the translation sites and see what it looks like - David Gerard ( talk) 15:49, 24 March 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.