- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No argument for deletion advanced. Courcelles ( talk) 18:19, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Biodiesel in the United Kingdom
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Biodiesel in the United Kingdom ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
trivia about historical UK taxation Chidgk1 ( talk) 13:37, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Chidgk1 ( talk) 13:37, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 13:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Doesn't look like trivia to me. If Biodiesel wasn't so long I would have voted to merge it there; as it is, it works best as a standalone. Mr.choppers | ✎ 01:34, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. "Trivia" is not a valid for deletion. It seems to pass WP:GNG, based on a quick view of significant coverage in reliable sources. It's part of a series on Biofuels and Energy law. The current articles on energy, and biodiesel specifically, are getting too long for our core readership to read on their cell phones, so a merge back is not feasible. Bearian ( talk) 15:27, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
UTC)
- Comment Sorry "trivia" was the wrong word - I should have written something like "excessive detail about historical UK taxation". Chidgk1 ( talk) 07:20, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment. Don't see a valid reason for the nomination. Excessive detail is a content issue. What Wikipedia policy the article fails has not been enunciated, so the nomination smacks of
WP:IDONTLIKEIT.
Rupples (
talk) 21:58, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- I am not really interested in policies - it fails Wikipedia:Summary style maybe. But I don’t like the article because it wastes the reader’s time - a lot is not specific to UK and that which is specific to UK I doubt is useful nowadays Chidgk1 ( talk) 14:20, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.