Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Billy_Guin References

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 00:34, 22 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Billy Guin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

County level official who fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Despite the length and detail the article is almost entirely made up on non-reliable sources including: obituaries of people in local newspapers who are not the subject of the article (Sources 8,10, 12, 14, 15, 18, 21, 26, 31, 32, 33, & 34); his own obit (1); dead links to online searches (3 & 4); original research and personal notes from the article's since-banned author (2 & 22); Local Newspaper articles that are both unlinked and untitled so we can't even verify that they even existed (11, 13, 17, & 28); Census records that do nothing more than prove that Guinn did, indeed, exist (5); a dead link about a public high school (6); a link to an E-yearbook site (7); a self-cited work by the article author in the North Louisiana History (16); an article about his administrative assistant (19); PDF's of a lawsuit's (20, 23 & 27); a general fact check about water fluoridation on the John Birch Society's website (24); Some sort of local recorded history about Shreveport's debate over water fluoridation that mentions Guinn 3 total times in a 4 page span out of 182 total pages in the document (25); a dead link to what appears to have been a list of Baptist Deacons in Shreveport, LA (29); a dead link to the flyer for a banquet (30). While the article is detailed and in-depth there's not really anything about Guin that indicates notability, and the sources used in the article don't do anything to establish that he was significant enough to meet GNG. GPL93 ( talk) 22:55, 13 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:14, 14 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:09, 21 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Delete Article was created by banned user user:Billy Hathorn and there is no notable coverage of the subject in reliable sources. SWL36 ( talk) 20:53, 21 March 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.