The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Daniel (
talk) 04:36, 20 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Page fails
WP:NAUTHOR and
WP:GNG. The doctoral publications fail the GNG guidelines, the two books were not significant new concepts, theories, or techniques per NAUTHOR, and failed to have any substantial coverage outside that.
~RAM (
talk) 05:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete not notable as a writer or as a computer programmer.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 18:05, 11 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Weak delete. His claim to fame is having written two editions of a definitive guide to HTML. I'm not sure that's enough.
Bearian (
talk) 01:14, 15 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Bearian, the guidelines for
WP:NAUTHOR are pretty specific as to whether or not the author is notable - I do not believe that he meets the criteria for this.
~RAM (
talk) 07:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete. This is an obviously promotional article about someone who has gotten a couple research grants and written a couple technical how-to books. Nothing notable here to meet
WP:NAUTHOR,
WP:ANYBIO, or any other guideline I can think of.
FalconK (
talk) 05:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.