The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete: Not an article. Advertising. Not notable.
Hithladaeus (
talk) 14:19, 6 June 2015 (UTC) Changing to weak delete on grounds of notability.
Hithladaeus (
talk) 01:33, 14 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment: The article we read today is much different from the one nominated for deletion. In particular, the most offensive violations of policy are gone. Although the debate has turned up sources, I'm having trouble. People say that AfD isn't clean up, but it is articles for deletion, not "concepts" for deletion, and if people argue to keep an article because the concept is valid, they're arguing fallaciously, in my opinion. There still aren't iRS of notability given in the article.
Hithladaeus (
talk) 01:33, 14 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - Unfortunately, I think I'm leaning more towards delete for now and maybe draft to userspace as my searches only found
this (News links) and
this (some reviews from Rock Paper Shotgun and PCGamer). It's gotten some coverage but nothing significant.
SwisterTwistertalk 21:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete, although it'll probably be remade when it's more notable. --Anarchyte 06:20, 11 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - I don't think notability is an issue for this game anymore. There are serval big Youtube Channels such as
NerdCubed,
Sips,
Northernlion, and
EnterElysium had done videos for this game, and had got considerable amounts of views on them.
Kdmjf12000 (
talk) 01:35, 12 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Those YouTube channels are all examples of
self-published sources which in general fail Wikipedia's criteria for reliablity, so they can't be used to establish notability.
The1337gamer (
talk) 19:48, 12 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep per Czar. Another useful source also:
[1] --
The1337gamer (
talk) 19:45, 13 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep There is sufficient coverage identified above to establish notability per the main notability guideline.
Davewild (
talk) 07:23, 14 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.