The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Though the article claims to be a list, it constitutes a violation of
WP:NOTBIBLIOGRAPHY. Since most entries in the article contain external links, it also violates
WP:LINKFARM, which states that Wikipedia must not host link repositories.
Modussiccandi (
talk) 11:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Category:Bibliographies is really for articles about bibliographies, but naturally some actual bibliographies have snuck past. However, I would say that is not relevant simply per
WP:WAX. --
Paul Carpenter (
talk) 12:49, 27 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge back into article on
Tirana. This list was part of "further reading" until it was pulled out just a few days ago.
Glendoremus (
talk) 20:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)reply
DeletePartial merge back to the main article, but the further reading should not be a link farm either. No indication that this is anything other than indiscriminate collection of articles that makes it an improvement for the reader.
Reywas92Talk 20:59, 26 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge back into the article it came from seems the best solution, in my opinion.
TH1980 (
talk) 00:00, 27 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge back into
Tirana. I have no idea where
WP:NOTBIBLIOGRAPHY came from, Wikipedia is filled with Bibliographies //
Timothy :: talk 16:47, 27 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.