The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. I don't see a consensus here. LizRead!Talk! 02:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)reply
*Keep - A
WP:NTV series, substantial sources, free images available on Google search. Rather than
WP:AfD, should have been tagged for "Additional Citations".
Sameeerrr (
talk) 22:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC) ( Blocked
sockpuppet)reply
Sameeerrr, NTV is an essay and you have to provide WP:THREE best coverage that you believe is sufficient to meet GNG. —
Saqib (
talk I
contribs) 09:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I don't understand your approach of providing "THREE" best references. If we were supposed to provide the only three best references, then I wonder Wikipedia would have limited it
WP:References section "To add Three Best sources" only.
Sameeerrr (
talk) 15:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 23:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep same rationale for almost every nomination. I am doubting WP:Before is done or not. Series received in-depth coverage
[1],
[2],
[3],
[4]Libraa2019 (
talk) 09:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)reply
You mentioned that you could'nt find subject in provided source 2 and 3, i would like to clarify its also known as Daag as it was previouly titled Daag before release and producers change title afterwords.
Libraa2019 (
talk) 10:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Libraa2019, OK, I was unaware of this as it wasn't
previously stated in the article. But nevertheless, provided coverage (
this and
this) is still ROTM coverage based on interviews -published in March 2019- to talk about the filming of the series. Remember Existence ≠ Notability. —
Saqib (
talk I
contribs) 11:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
DoczillaOhhhhhh, no! 02:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.